<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: new JACS-Select!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coronene.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437</link>
	<description>A chemistry blog about organic materials, nanocrap, life in the lab and kittens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chemistry Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full Frontal JACS</title>
		<link>http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-5086</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemistry Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full Frontal JACS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437#comment-5086</guid>
		<description>[...] JACS β initiative. It has been warmly received in the most part around the blogosphere [CSB, TCB, CB]. Although, I don&#8217;t have any complaints about the website, what I really wanted was less [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JACS β initiative. It has been warmly received in the most part around the blogosphere [CSB, TCB, CB]. Although, I don&#8217;t have any complaints about the website, what I really wanted was less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mevans</title>
		<link>http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-4904</link>
		<dc:creator>mevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437#comment-4904</guid>
		<description>The interview with Moore in the new JACS Select is really good...I&#039;m sure you (excimer) have heard it already, but for everybody else...yeah. Worth checking out if you&#039;re interested in organic solar cells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interview with Moore in the new JACS Select is really good&#8230;I&#8217;m sure you (excimer) have heard it already, but for everybody else&#8230;yeah. Worth checking out if you&#8217;re interested in organic solar cells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Al</title>
		<link>http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-4894</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437#comment-4894</guid>
		<description>Langmuir-Blodgett Faro shuffle diluted Aquadag with a clever organic, hook electrodes to opposite edges, then call a patent attorney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Langmuir-Blodgett Faro shuffle diluted Aquadag with a clever organic, hook electrodes to opposite edges, then call a patent attorney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ψ*Ψ</title>
		<link>http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-4892</link>
		<dc:creator>Ψ*Ψ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437#comment-4892</guid>
		<description>I hate to admit it...but graphical abstracts can definitely determine what I read and what I don&#039;t.  For journals that don&#039;t have them, I skim through titles and author lists...and some titles are boring, and some authors I&#039;ve never heard of.  But in JACS or Angewandte or any of the other journals that have adopted the awesomeness that is a little picture, I can check the graphic.  Sometimes it&#039;s a cool structure that makes me read a paper.  Other times the GA is so colorful I just can&#039;t turn away.  (C&#039;mon, who didn&#039;t see that one coming?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to admit it&#8230;but graphical abstracts can definitely determine what I read and what I don&#8217;t.  For journals that don&#8217;t have them, I skim through titles and author lists&#8230;and some titles are boring, and some authors I&#8217;ve never heard of.  But in JACS or Angewandte or any of the other journals that have adopted the awesomeness that is a little picture, I can check the graphic.  Sometimes it&#8217;s a cool structure that makes me read a paper.  Other times the GA is so colorful I just can&#8217;t turn away.  (C&#8217;mon, who didn&#8217;t see that one coming?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taitauwai</title>
		<link>http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437&#038;cpage=1#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>Taitauwai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coronene.com/blog/?p=437#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for telling. Have been so busy running around this week, hardly have time to check out ACS when they send me the alert! I really like the colourful graphic abstract. How about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for telling. Have been so busy running around this week, hardly have time to check out ACS when they send me the alert! I really like the colourful graphic abstract. How about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
