(Oligomer) size does matter

March 8th, 2010 by excimer

I swear to god, they’re just doing this on purpose now:

“Synthesis and molecular properties of donor–π-spacer–acceptor ynamides with up to four conjugated alkyne units.” pi-spacers. Because they space out pi orbitals. Girl.

However, the results of the paper did show that “intermolecular charge transfer” does “decrease” as the “length of the pi-spacer” “increases” beyond two “alkyne units.” Apparently for maximal “charge transfer” in “oligoynes” there’s a tradeoff between “length” and “pi-donating ability.”

…penis.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

21 Comments »

Comment by Rhenium
2010-03-08 11:13:53

Hmmm… the link is broken, NSFW perhaps?

Now they just need to test the preference for various crown ether ring sizes.

Comment by excimer
2010-03-08 11:17:06

ugh. people need to register DOIs before publishing.

Comment by Rhenium
2010-03-08 13:47:12

OK, it works now…

All bodily comparisons aside, I wonder why they opted for the N-benzyl-tosyl amino and dyinamide systems as opposed to a good old dimethyl or ethyl amino group?

Nothing really new here I have to admit, push-pull systems are rather old hat. I suppose they could work with Koen Clays and Andree Persoons in the Netherlands and get some reasonable second order NLO numbers.

Comment by Jack
2010-03-08 14:30:57

KC and AP are from Belgium…

Comment by Rhenium
2010-03-08 16:19:09

“B*****m” is the rudest word in the universe, which is “completely banned in all parts of the Galaxy… ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by excimer
2010-03-08 14:48:33

alkynylamines without a stabilized nitrogen will just polymerize or hydrolyze. The amides are far more stable. They’re a relatively unexplored functionality and I thought the paper was cute, though I would have liked to have seen NLO measurements.

 
 
 
Comment by J-bone
 
 
Comment by sam
2010-03-08 12:38:19

hehe. CT.

Comment by sam
2010-03-08 12:38:58

what about LE

 
 
Comment by sam
2010-03-08 13:38:18

this article’s companion:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp1001513

Comment by sam
2010-03-08 13:39:19
 
 
Comment by hegemon359
2010-03-08 14:11:37

hey, as long as we’re posting giggly penis humor, how about this epic title:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.018

 
Comment by davejac
2010-03-08 15:11:01

So when did the dick joke become the official gag of chemistry?

Comment by sam
2010-03-08 17:20:29

You said “gag”

 
Comment by Dave Eaton
2010-03-08 20:46:40

When was it not, if not ‘the’ joke, at least one that is, um, well-worn?

 
 
Comment by Uncle Al
2010-03-09 16:04:50

Needs a cyclodextrin – no glove, no love.

 
Comment by OrganicOverdose
2010-03-09 23:15:18

I honestly would like to believe that the researcher was completely unaware of the compound they are making but surely someone around their labs would be like “yeah, I’m making tiny tiny phalluses again this week”

 
Comment by milkshake
2010-03-10 03:05:09

if you take the IR spectra of these things you can make them vibrate

 
Comment by ChemInvoker
2010-03-10 16:17:54

If I ever get a chance to develope standardized unit of molecular length I was going to call it the “Johnson”

 
Comment by LiqC
2010-03-11 18:43:32

Does it interact with copper nanotubes?

 
Comment by LiqC
2010-05-05 19:57:23

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ol100578z
“Through the annulus…”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.