DCM: not just a solvent!
August 26th, 2008 by Ψ*ΨOrganic chemists can go ahead and run away screaming, because this post is about direct carrier multiplication and not dichloromethane. No carbon this time—troublesome, eh? But it’s been about…five months since I last put up a serious post on semiconductors. Entirely too long. To be fair, in that time I’ve been reading up on band theory and solid-state awesomeness, so I haven’t just been lazy.
Direct carrier multiplication, for the uninitiated (such as myself—physicists can have a field day correcting me here), occurs when an exciton—an electrostatically bound electron-hole pair—creates more excitons. Naturally, the first exciton has to be pretty high-energy in order for this to happen…say, between 2 and 3 times the bandgap. For those of you who are scratching your heads and asking why, and haven’t considered who’s writing the post and just how much she likes applied research…I’ll give you a hint. It has something to do with solar cells.
In conventional (and sadly carbonless) solar cell materials, light is absorbed like mad above the bandgap, and pretty much not at all below it. (“Like mad” is a scientific term—google a CdSe thin film or nanocrystal absorption spectrum if you don’t believe me!) But what about WAY above the bandgap? Hopefully we can agree that blue photons are higher in energy than red photons.[1] What happens to the extra energy? Usually, the answer is…nothing exciting. It just gets turned into heat.
IF, instead, we could harvest the extra energy, we’d have more efficient solar cells. Through DCM, you get extra charge carriers from that excess energy. The question, then, is how? First, light is absorbed (this is, of course, the starting point for all things solar)—in this case, really high-energy light. So the electron that gets excited doesn’t go straight to the LUMO (or whatever you would call the equivalent for a crystal?), it goes to some higher energy level. We call this a hot carrier.[2]
Normally, the hot carrier loses its energy through phonon-assisted decay—it emits phonons (lattice vibrations; raise your hand if you thought I misspelled “photon”?) and ends up back in the LUMO. I say “normally” because this is typical of bulk semiconductors. Nanocrystals are a little different: less energy levels to worry about. With this decay process inhibited to some degree, what can happen to the hot carriers?
The answer: impact ionization (hereafter II, not to be confused with Roman numeral II). Instead of dumping energy into the lattice and making it vibrate (as in, emitting phonons?) the super-excited electron can transfer its energy to other electrons, thereby producing more excitons. Of course, there is an annoying reverse process to worry about: Auger recombination.[3] This occurs when one of the excitons recombines, and the energy released goes toward exciting another exciton to a higher-than-LUMO energy level.
At this point, I’ll leave you with a very interesting and very recent paper on the subject by a few people out at NREL. Unlike me, the authors definitely know what they’re talking about. Organikers beware: there are some equations lurking about.[4]
[1] If you disagree, you need a math flogging.
[2] It’s hot cos it’s fly. You ain’t cos you not.
[3] You know you’re a nerd if you hear Auger when someone says OJ.
[4] If this frightens you, I suggest drawing a benzene ring around the curly S of death, as a protective sigil against the evils of integration.
“Organic chemists can go ahead and run away screaming, because this post is about direct carrier multiplication and not dichloromethane. ”
Fine, then I’m not going to read the rest of the post!!!…..
….OK,OK, OK, I can’t handle any more guilt I’ll read the damn thing. Geez!!!
MWAHAHAHAHA!!! my evil plan is working!!!
This is why
This is why
This is why I’m hot
I was reading somewhere that the reason plants are green is that they hardly bother with absorbing green photons efectively. Yellow, red are most plentiful photons, whereas the blue/near UV are energetic enough to provide *multiple* electron-hole pairs. I suppose DCM is it then, but I dont know anything about the subject.
By thew way I like the idea of drawing Kekule hexagrams, to cast off the evil integrals.
i’m not sure plants can take advantage of DCM…AFAIK, it’s only an inorganic thing, pretty much just nanocrystals. anyone know for sure?
tasty plants!
but as a curious coincidence, our eyes are most sensitive to green light.
In terms of light-harvesting, chloroplasts are pretty good at it- that’s what they were designed to do. The sole purpose of most of the pigments in chloroplasts is to absorb light and transfer it to the chlorophylls that do the redox chemistry necessary to start the photosynthetic cycle. The electron transfer only occurs at one site of the chloroplast- the light is funneled into it by resonance energy transfer. And since the sun emits the most in the blue and yellow/red, that’s where chloroplast pigments absorb light most efficiently (as do most metalloporphyrins- the Q band absorbs in the red, and the Soret/B-band absorbs in the blue/violet).
If you think this stuff is too awesome and it makes you crap your pants, read up on the Waz’s work on electron and energy transport.
It’s interesting you mention that. I’m reminded of a post by the Bad Astronomer a while back.
No pretty pictures?
I’m shocked that a post containing hot, vibrating, and super-excited got no comments about bodily functions. Grad school must now be the convent and cloisture, everyone with nose to grindstone.
Ok, a carbon insert. Everyone knows that the macro discovery of C60 drew huge attention to the nanoworld and carbon nanotubes were originally just an undesired side-reaction waste. But C60 and C70 were found in due to their solubility in toluene. They dissolve because their bandgaps are wide. Narrow bandgap fullerenes, like C58 and C62, are highly reactive and react with other narrow bandgap fullerenes to form some of the amorphous soot (ever wonder why it was C60 and not C58?). Bandgaps affect a lot of properties.
I wonder if a structurally ordered form of C60, like a crystallized polymer of specific size and shape, would have good bandgap properties for this? Most likely not, though, because the probability of phonon loss would be pretty large.
Trivial solution: Focusing optics sum energy/area. One need merely design an optic that sums frequency/area. Uncle Al won’t insult Dear Reader by posting the schematic.
I am completely unconvinced that DCM is real/usable for narrow-band gap PV’s: e.g. Nair and Bawendi, Phys Rev B, 2007, 76, 81304(R).
Perhaps someone more initiated in this field could fill in whether or not DCM [i]is[/i] real (again, in the USABLE IN A DEVICE sense) ’cause, while tempting and pretty awesome if it works, DCM doesn’t jibe well with what I know about semiconductors OR QD’s. . .
I’m no expert, but I’d place it in the “academic curiosity” category. There has been a good deal of controversy over DCM in the first place–I don’t have references off the top of my head, and am not as well read on the manner as I could be (after all, my research is just organic).
Anyone more knowledgeable on the matter?