Heh heh… it says bone.

February 12th, 2009 by excimer

I had no idea “bone dry” was a technical term. (It’s a lecture bottle of CO2.)

Carbon Dioxide, Bone-Dry

Uhhh huh huh huh. Bone.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

32 Comments »

Comment by Liberal Chemist
2009-02-12 21:05:19

I think it means that the gas was passed through some activated charcoal that was made from bone. Could be wrong.

I still say finger cots have the highest giggle factor for anything in the lab.

Comment by excimer
2009-02-12 21:55:46

uhhh… stopcock, anyone? stop. cock. cock. penis.

I am very mature.

 
Comment by Chemjobber
2009-02-15 03:32:25

Not if you have “dental tampons” in the lab.

Comment by LiqC
2009-02-17 20:23:21

It must me hard to contain those, with teeth…

 
 
 
Comment by Siddharth
2009-02-12 21:51:33

I don’t know about the context for a gas, but for a solid I think it means the weight of the substance with the equilibrium moisture content removed.

 
Comment by Wavefunction
2009-02-13 09:48:30

And what bone is the reference bone? Homo sapiens? Homo habilis? E. Coli?

Comment by milkshake
2009-02-15 12:07:09

Homo erectus, of course

 
 
Comment by Sarah
2009-02-13 11:46:04

Perhaps because the term ‘desiccated’ only refers to solids? ;¬)

 
Comment by Reverend J
2009-02-13 20:19:15

Wow, now that it’s a technical term I’ll have to use it more often!

 
Comment by MCC
2009-02-14 16:18:00

Personally, the talk of penetration caught my attention in pchem…..

Comment by Ψ*Ψ
2009-02-14 17:26:30

and stimulated emission. *snicker*

Comment by whitefarseer
2009-02-15 04:18:44

oh thank goodness its not just me, i crack up inside every time. *snort*

 
Comment by Wavefunction
2009-02-16 10:29:45

And if you are working late in the lab with a laser, you are surely indulging in stimulated nocturnal emissions

 
 
 
Comment by unbalanced reaction
2009-02-14 22:16:50

Hartree fock gets quite a few eyebrow raises in lecture, but my personal favorite is mother liquor.

Comment by Ψ*Ψ
2009-02-14 23:46:18

mother liquor > mother nature :D

 
 
Comment by The Chemist
2009-02-14 23:34:41

Hello. Separatory Funnel? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

(Maybe I’m doing this wrong.)

 
Comment by excimer
2009-02-15 11:15:27

Two words: Wang resin.

 
Comment by Liberal Chemist
2009-02-15 14:52:06

In organic synthesis uncontrolled cleavage is always a problem.

Comment by Hap
2009-02-15 21:07:20

Not where I went to school.

N-hydroxysuccinimide used to amuse me.

 
 
Comment by a-non
2009-02-15 21:08:48

back-side attack and intimate ion pairs always did it for me

 
Comment by John Fetzer
2009-02-16 14:42:45

I always laugh when I see the abbreviation Anal. Chem.

Comment by Ψ*Ψ
2009-02-17 20:31:26

so accurate, too!

Comment by excimer
2009-02-17 22:27:48

heh. not really…

Comment by John Fetzer
2009-02-18 09:38:36

Doer or recipient, data generator or data user…..the perspectives can be quite different from either side and due to what you enjoy doing.

 
 
 
 
Comment by LiqC
2009-02-17 20:25:19

Invagination. I asked a question to confirm what I’m seeing on a slide. At a group meeting. The boss’ reaction was “life is high school”.

Comment by John Fetzer
2009-02-18 09:40:52

There were a lot of acronyms in NMR that were like that. The big-names in NMR were very into that…..and a lot of big-names were dirty old men.

Comment by Chip
2009-02-19 08:32:55

Hard to believe that they got away with “proton-enhanced nuclear induction spectroscopy”.

Comment by John Fetzer
2009-02-20 11:21:56

Supposedly that was just a rearrangement of Pines’ name. Yeah, right.

Comment by Chip
2009-02-20 16:07:45

The acronym was never capitized in the journals, for obvious reasons. I’m sure you know about the inside joke calling his CO lab the “mile-high penis lab”. …and I had trouble getting the journal to accept my “EIEIO” acronym…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Dave Eaton
2009-02-18 22:02:19

In school we used to love to discuss how s-p hybridized orbital properties varied as a function of the ‘p-ness’ of the orbitals…

And I can’t see the abbreviation for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science without snickering. I snicker even louder when someone goes out of their way to pronounce it ” puh NAHS”.

Inside I’m always saying “I got yer ‘puh NAHS’ right here, scooter…”, especially when it is someone far more famous and scienceriffic than I will ever be saying it.

Comment by Ψ*Ψ
2009-02-18 22:34:14

PNAS always, always, always cracks me up inside. Glad I’m not the only one! :D

 
 
Comment by Gaussling
2009-03-21 17:26:00

That is truly funny. I’m glad you captured this image.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.